The Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) has confirmed in the case of Koenig v The Mind Gym that continuity of employment starts from the date upon which an employee's work under a contract of employment actually begins and not from the date upon which an employee undertakes activities for an employer. Work outside of a contract of employment cannot count, but determining what work falls under a contract of employment is a matter of fact and degree.
In this case, the Claimant was dismissed by the Respondent on 29 September 2010. Her written contract of employment provided that she had started work on 1 October 2009, which meant that she lacked sufficient continuity of service to bring an unfair dismissal claim. She appealed to the EAT on the basis that she had sufficient continuity of service by virtue of the fact that she had attended a meeting with a client of the Respondent on 29 September 2009 which should have been regarded as work under her contract of employment.
Paul Burton, Employment Solicitor, says "The EAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the employment tribunal was entitled to conclude that there was no contract of employment operating on the 29 September 2009 because the Claimant was not obliged to attend the client meeting, she was not there in a capacity as an employee of the Respondent, she was not paid for her attendance, and she went to the meeting entirely of her own choice."
Get in touch if you need more information on this topic. You should find the other articles in June's employment newsletter of interest.
For a free initial meeting please call 01202 499255 and Kate or Paul will be happy to discuss any questions you may have.